illustration of a cat@exu3/edu
All Electric Energy Systems

Solar I-V and P-V Curves

Introduction

Solar panels convert light energy to electrical energy, and their performance depends on strength of sunlight, orientation, and resistance. The purpose of this lab was to understand how solar panels behave in various conditions. In this lab, we investigated the performance of a 10 W solar panel under varying load conditions using a resistor decade box. We measured current and voltage under varying resistances and panel orientation.

Methods and Measurements

We used a 10 W rated solar PV panel, resistor decade box, and two multimeters to measure voltage and current. We configured the decade box for twelve values from 1 to 100 ohms and recorded the voltage and current (table 1). We also measured voltage and current for partial shading (table 2) and angle/direction (table 3).

Resistance (ohm)Actual Resistance (ohm)error %Voltage VCurrent APower P
000
11.330%2.83E-010.2170.0614327
55.36%1.140.2150.2451
1010.33%2.2340.2190.489246
2020.74%4.580.221.0076
3029.4-2%6.490.221.4278
4040.31%9.090.2272.06343
5050.51%9.670.2392.31113
6060.81%14.90.2453.6505
7070.51%16.880.2384.01744
80834%18.240.2193.99456
9089.90%18.810.2063.87486
100100.20%19.10.1913.6481

Table 1: experimental voltage, current, and power data based on resistor box. The first column, Resistance, is the target resistance configured on the decade box, and the second column, Actual Resistance, is the resistance measured by the multimeter.

shadingVoltage VCurrent APower W
none12.210.1742.12454
1 cell6.40.0920.5888
4 cells2.9090.0410.119269
1 full column1.1290.0140.015806
full panel face down1.05E-010.0010.000105

Table 2: experimental voltage, current, and power due to shading.

Angle/DirectionVoltage Vcurrent Apower W
nominal17.090.2374.05033
90CCW14.10.1932.7213
180CCW facing away from sun5.30.0750.3975
horizontal11.30.1651.8645

Table 3: experimental voltage, current, and power data based on angle/direction of panel.

Calculations and Results

The shape of our I-V curve (figure 1) generally follows the trend of the standard curve. In our I-V curve, the current seems to increase slightly as voltage increases, and we believe that is caused by changes in cloud cover during data collection. As clouds moved, more direct sunlight reached the panel.

IV and PV curves from table 1 measured voltage and current. Maximum power point is plotted on the PV curve at P = 4.02 W

Figure 1: IV and PV curves from table 1 measured voltage and current. Maximum power point is plotted on the PV curve at P = 4.02 W.

Our experimental values for Pmax, Isc, and Voc were 4.02 W, .18 A, and 20.3 V respectively. The specifications of the 10W-rated panel for Pmax, Isc, and Voc are 10 W, .64 A, ~21.7 V. The measured Isc (and consequently Pmax) was much lower than expected because it was overcast while we were gathering data. The measured Voc was close to the manufacturer’s specification.

Our relative resistance value errors (figure 2) were fairly low. We configured the switches on the resistance box such that the measured resistance was as close as possible to the target resistance. The errors did not appear to have a noticeable effect on the experimental data.

Figure 2: percent error versus measured resistance graph shows low error rates. The high error rate for x = 1 ohm (measured 1.3 ohm) is because small values exaggerate the actual error.

If the 10 W-rated panels are 15 years old and the panel rating is expected to degrade .5% per year, the panels should be producing at a 7.5% loss, equivalent to 9.25 W. Our measured power output was 4.02 W which is far below that. However, we are unable to make conclusions about panel aging because we believe that overcast meteorological conditions were the primary contributor to the panel inefficiency.

Conclusion

We can conclude that environmental factors including irradiance, shading, and orientation can affect power output of the panel. Greater shading reduces efficiency. The resistance at the maximum power point was approximately 70 ohms. As the panel’s angle away from the sun increases, the output decreases.